yeah I'd say, usually platforms like this don't like alt accounts but I suppose you can see what he says....I just figure he may not particularly be too keen on the idea.
yeah I'd say, usually platforms like this don't like alt accounts but I suppose you can see what he says....I just figure he may not particularly be too keen on the idea.
If you wanted the live stream Chris did, the way they talked about fiction and how unique interactions was part of the future of this platform and the success of fiction writers.
...I don't believe substack is against this kind of use. Especially when it's positive and creates more interaction with readers.
Now, I can certainly be wrong, but I'm not sure I am.
*the heady aroma of Dragon's blood and myrrh enters the chat*
There is, of course, always the delicate debate about the responsible use of power. Especially given some of the delicious controversies that have surrounded the platform from time to time.
So very... Savory.
But I find it easy to gorge myself on conflict these days, and as for bringing Death? He's got no need of my services in that regard! People are all too happy to rush toward him with reckless abandon and open arms. Usually ignoring a clearly printed sign in the process.
Substack has a very... in your eye, contrary nature to it. Misfits, rogues, and creative radicals abound, like a gathering of everyone who didn't 'fit in' at school. They've built their own little corner of the internet cafeteria, and it strikes me that this is precisely the sort of thing that they just might do...
IF ONLY BECAUSE no one else is.
If I were a betting man -- and I am *neither* of these things -- I wouldn't dismiss the idea until it has received thorough address.
yeah I'd say, usually platforms like this don't like alt accounts but I suppose you can see what he says....I just figure he may not particularly be too keen on the idea.
If you wanted the live stream Chris did, the way they talked about fiction and how unique interactions was part of the future of this platform and the success of fiction writers.
...I don't believe substack is against this kind of use. Especially when it's positive and creates more interaction with readers.
Now, I can certainly be wrong, but I'm not sure I am.
*the heady aroma of Dragon's blood and myrrh enters the chat*
There is, of course, always the delicate debate about the responsible use of power. Especially given some of the delicious controversies that have surrounded the platform from time to time.
So very... Savory.
But I find it easy to gorge myself on conflict these days, and as for bringing Death? He's got no need of my services in that regard! People are all too happy to rush toward him with reckless abandon and open arms. Usually ignoring a clearly printed sign in the process.
Substack has a very... in your eye, contrary nature to it. Misfits, rogues, and creative radicals abound, like a gathering of everyone who didn't 'fit in' at school. They've built their own little corner of the internet cafeteria, and it strikes me that this is precisely the sort of thing that they just might do...
IF ONLY BECAUSE no one else is.
If I were a betting man -- and I am *neither* of these things -- I wouldn't dismiss the idea until it has received thorough address.